Wikimedia Commons

Commons:Featured picture candidates

Shortcut
This project page in other languages:

Other featured candidates:

Media 

Skip to current candidates Skip to current candidates

Featured picture candidates

Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures.

Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and current month.

For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election.

Formal things edit

Nominating edit

Guidelines for nominators edit

Please read the complete guidelines before nominating.

This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:

  • Licensing – Images licensed with solely "GFDL" or "GFDL and an NC-only license" are not acceptable due the restrictions placed on re-use by these licenses.
  • Resolution – Raster images of lower resolution than 2 million pixels (pixels, not bytes) are typically rejected unless there are strong mitigating reasons. This does not apply to vector graphics (SVGs).
    • Graphics on Commons are not only viewed on conventional computer screens. They may be used in high-resolution print versions, and the images may be cropped to focus on portions of the image. See Commons:Why we need high resolution media for more information.
  • Scans – While not official policy, Help:Scanning provides advice on the preparation of various types of images that may be useful.
  • General quality – pictures being nominated should be of high technical quality.
  • Digital manipulations must not deceive the viewer. Digital manipulation for the purpose of correcting flaws in an image is generally acceptable, provided it is limited, well-done, and not intended to deceive.
    • For photographs, typical acceptable manipulations include cropping, perspective correction, sharpening/blurring, and color/exposure correction. More extensive manipulations, such as removal of distracting background elements, should be clearly described in the image text, by means of the {{Retouched picture}} template. Undescribed or mis-described manipulations which cause the main subject to be misrepresented are never acceptable. For images made from more than one photo, you can use the {{Panorama}} or {{Focus stacked image}} templates.
    • For historic images, acceptable manipulations might include digitally fixing rips, removal of stains, cleanup of dirt, and, for mass-produced artworks such as engravings, removal of flaws inherent to the particular reproduction, such as over-inking. Careful color adjustments may be used to bring out the original work from the signs of ageing, though care should be taken to restore a natural appearance. The original artistic intent should be considered when deciding whether it is appropriate to make a change. Edits to historic material should be documented in detail within the file description, and an unedited version should be uploaded and cross linked for comparison.
  • Value – our main goal is to feature most valuable pictures from all others. Pictures should be in some way special, so please be aware that:
    • almost all sunsets are aesthetically pleasing, and most such pictures are not in essence different from others,
    • night-shots are pretty but normally more details can be shown on pictures taken at daytime,
    • beautiful does not always mean valuable.
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documents edit

There are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject.

Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable.

Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself.

Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well.

Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:

  • Notable in its own right: Works by major artists, or works that are otherwise notable, such as the subjects of a controversy.
  • Of high artistic merit: Works which, while not particularly well known, are nonetheless wonderful examples of their particular type or school of art.
  • Of high historic merit: The historical method values very early illustrations of scenes and events over later ones. Hence, a work of poor quality depicting a contemporaneous historical event can be nonetheless important, even if the artistic merit is relatively low. Likewise, scans or photographs of important documents – which may not be at all artistic – nonetheless may be highly valuable if the documents are historically significant. The reason for the image's historical importance should be briefly stated in the nomination, for those reviewers unfamiliar with the subject.
  • Of high illustrative merit: Works that illustrate or help explain notable subjects, for instance, illustrations of books, scientific subjects, or technical processes. The amount of artistic merit required for these will vary by subject, but, for instance, an illustration that makes the working of a complicated piece of machinery very clear need not be notable as a piece of artwork as well, whereas an illustration for a book might well be expected to reach much higher artistic standards.

Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced."

Photographs edit

On the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.

  • Focus – every important object in the picture should normally be sharp.
  • Exposure refers to the shutter diaphragm combination that renders an image with a tonal curve that ideally is able to represent in acceptable detail shadows and highlights within the image. This is called latitude. Images can be on the low side of the tonal curve (low range), the middle (middle range) or high side (upper range). Lack of shadow detail is not necessarily a negative characteristic. In fact, it can be part of the desired effect. Burned highlights in large areas are a distracting element.
  • Composition refers to the arrangement of the elements within the image. The "Rule of thirds" is one useful guideline. Horizons should almost never be placed in the middle, where they "cut" the image in half. Often, a horizon creating a top or bottom third of the space works better. The main idea is to use space to create a dynamic image.
    • Foreground and background – foreground and background objects may be distracting. You should check that something in front of the subject doesn't hide important elements and that something in background doesn't spoil the composition (for example that the streetlight doesn't "stand" on someone's head).
  • Movement control refers to the manner in which motion is represented in the image. Motion can be frozen or blurred. Neither one is better than the other. It is the intention of representation. Movement is relative within the objects of the image. For example, photographing a race car that appears frozen in relation to the background does not give us a sense of speed or motion, so technique dictates to represent the car in a frozen manner but with a blurred background, thus creating the sense of motion, this is called "panning". On the other hand, representing a basketball player in a high jump frozen in relation to everything else, due to the "unnatural" nature of the pose would be a good photograph.
  • Depth of field (DOF) refers to the area in focus in front of and beyond main subject. Depth of field is chosen according to the specific needs of every picture. Large or small DOF can either way add or subtract to the quality of the image. Low depth of field can be used to bring attention to the main subject, separating it from the general environment. High depth of field can be used to emphasize space. Short focal length lenses (wide angles) yield large DOF, and vice versa, long focal lenses (telephotos) have shallow DOF. Small apertures yield large DOF and conversely, large apertures yield shallow DOF.

On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.

  • Shape refers to the contour of the main subjects.
  • Volume refers to the three dimensional quality of the object. This is accomplished using side light. Contrary to general belief, front lighting is not the best light. It tends to flatten subject. Best light of day is early morning or late afternoon.
  • Color is important. Oversaturated colors are not good.
  • Texture refers to the quality of the surface of the subject. It is enhanced by side lighting… it is the "feel" to the touch.
  • Perspective refers to the "angle" accompanied by lines that disappear into a vanishing point that may or may not be inside the image.
  • Balance refers to the arrangement of subjects within the image that can either give equal weight or appear to be heavier on one side.
  • Proportion refers to the relation of size of objects in picture. Generally, we tend to represent small objects small in relation to others, but a good technique is to represent small objects large contrary to natural size relationship. For example, a small flower is given preponderance over a large mountain…. This is called inversion of scales.
Not all elements must be present. Some photographs can be judged on individual characteristics, that is, an image can be about color or texture, or color AND texture, etc.
  • Noise refers to unwanted corruption of color brightness and quality and can be caused by underexposure. It is not a desirable quality and can be grounds for opposition.
  • Symbolic meaning or relevance … Opinion wars can begin here … A bad picture of a very difficult subject is better than a good picture of an ordinary subject. A good picture of a difficult subject is an extraordinary photograph.
Images can be culturally biased by the photographer and/or the observer. The meaning of the image should be judged according to the cultural context of the image, not by the cultural context of the observer. An image "speaks" to people, and it has the capacity to evoke emotion such as tenderness, rage, rejection, happiness, sadness, etc. Good photographs are not limited to evoking pleasant sensations …

You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating.

Video and audio edit

Please nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates.

Set nominations edit

If a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:

  • Faithful digital reproductions of works notable in their own right, which the original author clearly intended to be viewed as a set. Examples: pages in a pamphlet, crops (puzzle pieces) of a prohibitively large scan, a pair of pendant paintings. Not acceptable: Arbitrary selection of sample works by an artist.
  • A sequence of images showing the passage of time. They could depict frames of a moving/changing object or a static object during different times of day or different seasons. Examples: diagrams illustrating a process, steps of a dance, metamorphosis of an insect, maps/drawings/photos of the same subject over the years (frame of view should be more or less the same).
  • A group of images depicting the same subject from different viewpoints, preferably taken under the same lighting conditions when possible. Examples: Exterior and interior of a building, different facades of a building, different interior views, obverse and inverse of a banknote/coin. Not acceptable: A selection of different rooms in a skyscraper, the facade of a church plus an organ, any images of fundamentally different scopes.
  • A group of images which show all possible variations of a particular class of object. Examples: Male and female versions of an animal (preferably in the same setting), all known species of a genus. Not acceptable: A few breeds of cats (unless they share a defining characteristic and represent all possible examples of that).

Simple tutorial for new users edit

Tutorial: Nominate on COM:FPC
How to nominate in 8 simple steps

STEP 1

  • STEP 1
    STEP 1

STEP 2

  • STEP 2
    STEP 2

STEP 3

  • STEP 3
    STEP 3

STEP 4

  • STEP 4
    STEP 4

STEP 5

  • STEP 5
    STEP 5

STEP 6

  • STEP 6
    STEP 6

STEP 7

  • STEP 7
    STEP 7

STEP 8

  • STEP 8 (last step)
    STEP 8 (last step)

NOTE: You don't need to worry if you are not sure, other users will try their best to help you.

Adding a new nomination edit

If you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate image description and licensing, then do the following.

Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button.

All single files:

For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2

All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".


Step 2: follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save that page.

Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg}}

Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports An image will only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.

Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using {{subst:FPC-notice|Your image filename.jpg}} -- ~~~~.

Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters.

Voting edit

Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed.

You may use the following templates:

  • {{Support}} ( Support),
  • {{Oppose}} ( Oppose),
  • {{Neutral}} ( Neutral),
  • {{Comment}} ( Comment),
  • {{Info}} ( Info),
  • {{Question}} ( Question),
  • {{Request}} ( Request).

You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator.

A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above.

Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:

  • No reason
  • "I don't like it" and other empty assessments
  • "You can do better" and other criticisms of the author/nominator rather than the image

Remember also to put your signature (~~~~).

Featured picture delisting candidates edit

Over time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:

Text to use Displays as Meaning
{{Keep}}  Keep It deserves to remain a featured picture
{{Delist}}  Delist It does not deserve to be a featured picture anymore.

This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:

Text to use Displays as Meaning
{{Keep}}  Keep Do not replace the old image with the new image as a FP.
{{Delistandreplace}}  Delist and replace Replace the current FP with the proposed replacement.

If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box:


In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:

  • Information on the origin of the image (creator, uploader);
  • A link to the original FP nomination (it will appear under "Links" on the image description page);
  • Your reasons for nominating the image and your username.

After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list.

As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose.

Featured picture candidate policy edit

General rules edit

  1. The voting period is 9 complete days counted from the nomination. After the end of this period the result will be determined. Votes added on day 10 and after are not counted.
  2. Nominations by anonymous contributors are welcome.
  3. Contributions to discussion by anonymous contributors are welcome.
  4. Only registered contributors whose Commons accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Exception: registered users can always vote in their own nominations no matter the account age and number of edits.
  5. Nominations do not count as votes. Support must be explicitly stated.
  6. Nominators and authors can withdraw their nominated pictures at any time. This is done by adding the following template: {{Withdraw}} ~~~~. Also, remember that if more than one version is nominated, you should explicitly state which version you are withdrawing.
  7. Remember, the goal of the Wikimedia Commons project is to provide a central repository for free images to be used by all Wikimedia projects, including possible future projects. This is not simply a repository for Wikipedia images, so images should not be judged here on their suitability for that project.
  8. Rules of the 5th day based on vote counts on day number 5 (day of nomination + 5):
    1. Pictures are speedy declined if they have fewer than two support votes.
    2. Pictures are speedy promoted if they have 10 support votes or more and no oppose votes. (Note that if it takes more than five days to reach this threshold, the picture can be promoted as soon as it is reached.) This does not apply to nominations containing at least one ‘Alternative’ image – because it is possible that another image can overtake the one in the lead during the last days, such nominations are never closed early.
    3. Once either speedy criterion is reached, the voting period is considered closed, and no more votes may be added.
  9. Pictures tagged {{FPX}} may be removed from the list 24 hours after the tag was applied, provided there are no support votes other than that of the nominator.
  10. Pictures tagged {{FPD}} (FP-Denied) may be removed from the list 24 hours after the tag was applied.
  11. Only two active nominations by the same user (that is, nominations under review and not yet closed) are allowed. The main purpose of this measure is to contribute to a better average quality of nominations, by driving nominators/creators to choose carefully the pictures presented to the forum.

Featuring and delisting rules edit

A candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:

  1. Appropriate license (of course)
  2. At least seven  Support votes (or 7  Delist votes for a delist) at the end of nine days
  3. Ratio of supporting/opposing votes at least 2/1 (a two-thirds majority); same for delist/keep votes
  4. Two different versions of the same picture cannot both be featured, but only the one with higher level of support, as determined by the closer. Whenever the closer is not sure which version has consensus to be featured, they should attempt to contact the voters to clarify their opinions if not clear from the nomination page.

The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. There is also a limit of two active delisting nominations per user, which is in addition to the limit of two active regular nominations.

The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules.

Above all, be polite edit

Please don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care.

Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken.

See also edit

Table of contents edit

List may contain works considered Not Safe for Work (nudity).

Nominators are requested, out of courtesy, to include the {{Nsfw}} template with such images. Users may select the gadget in user preferences "Deferred display of images tagged with {{Nsfw}} on COM:FPC" to enable the template's effect of hiding the image until selected.

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

Featured picture candidates edit

File:Bloemknop van een Camellia × williamsii 'Roger Hall'. 26-03-2024 (actm.) 02.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2024 at 04:22:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:F-15E takes on fuel from KC-10.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2024 at 02:22:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • It's probably one of a series of photos from the fueling mission, and explanation to why the planes were so close to each other and lazy file naming. It could be renamed "Airman in F-15E takes photo of KC-10" ;-), given what is going on in the photo, or "F-15E during fueling stage from KC-10". --Cart (talk) 10:09, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:003 Olive-bellied Sunbird in flight at Kibale forest National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2024 at 02:02:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Equestrian monument of Friedrich Franz II in Schwerin (3).jpg edit

Voting period ends on 31 May 2024 at 19:49:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Heracles statue at the Schwerin Castle (1).jpg edit

Voting period ends on 31 May 2024 at 19:47:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Un ramasseur de sel dans les marais salants d'El Abassia à kerkennah - tunisie.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 31 May 2024 at 19:21:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Florence Cathedral seen from Piazzale Michelangelo night dllu.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 31 May 2024 at 17:59:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Mont de Chemun sun Mot de Sëuc y Sasplat.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 31 May 2024 at 14:22:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Clowns in Tunis 2.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 31 May 2024 at 10:32:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Acacia in Ein Khadra Desert Oasis 00 (137).jpg edit

Voting period ends on 31 May 2024 at 09:56:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Arc Diana Veteranorum.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 30 May 2024 at 21:09:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:027 Atlantic puffin in flight with mouth full of fishes Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 30 May 2024 at 11:22:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Villnoess St Magdalena 1.JPG edit

Voting period ends on 30 May 2024 at 11:19:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Great White Shark (Carcharodon carcharias) (32749142772).jpg edit

Voting period ends on 30 May 2024 at 11:11:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
The word "crop" can also mean "framing" in photography terms. No actual cutting of the image needs to have been made. It simply refers to the way the photographer has selected the scene. Since you are new here (like you wrote on another nom), there might be photo terms that are unfamiliar to you. You find most of them at COM:PT. --Cart (talk) 19:16, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Windows - Playa Santiago 01.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 30 May 2024 at 09:16:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Pécheurs démêlant les filets à Bahiret el Bibane.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 30 May 2024 at 09:05:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
Commons is just an archive for photos; very few photos are "used" here. The photos kept here are used in Wikipedias all over the world, as well as all the Wiki sister projects, schools, museums, organisations, and thousands of others that get their photos from Commons. Commons is like a "stock photo site" where images can be used for free if you credit the photographer. --Cart (talk) 19:25, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Support ★ 16:37, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Oppose Clear distorsions of the face in the corner, due to the wide angle (24 mm) lens. Crop is too tight at the top. The guy seems to lower his head to fit it into the frame :-) The arm and hand in the foreground suffer from motion blur. Probably the shutter speed was not fast enough. The background is not very sharp, and the light is dull around the man with red jumper. To finish, there are big dust spots in the center, one between the worker and the street lamp, another one at the top, and at the right too -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:41, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Алматы, Вознесенский собор, слуховое окно колокольни.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 30 May 2024 at 03:38:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:African striped skinks (Trachylepis striata) Malolotja.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 29 May 2024 at 16:26:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Antïlope acuático (Kobus ellipsiprymnus), parque nacional del Lago Mburo, Uganda, 2024-02-01, DD 25.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 29 May 2024 at 13:58:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • I didn't say anything was wrong; I just made the comment as this subspecies does not have the white diagnostic ring of white fur on its backside, so doesn't look like a typical waterbuck. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:25, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sphingonotus rubescens in Dghoumes national park.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 29 May 2024 at 11:20:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
I've added an approximate gallery, but some better identification of this grasshopper would be appreciated. --Cart (talk) 11:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dear W.Carter I requested a rename in the basis of this link the actual name is "Sphingonotus rubescens"
https://acrinwafrica.mnhn.fr/bases/fiches/Sphingonotus_rubescens.html IssamBarhoumi (talk) 13:47, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, name, code, gallery and links fixed. Please try to have all these things in order before your next nomination. It makes everything so much easier. You are a regular here now, so such things are sort of expected of you now. ;-) Good luck with your nom! --Cart (talk) 14:18, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you IssamBarhoumi (talk) 14:27, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Animal too small IMO, and lack of detail. Please compare with the FPs in the same gallery -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:05, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ok thank you i ll withdraw it an do better next time IssamBarhoumi (talk) 09:50, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your comments. --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 09:54, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Balbuzard pecheur Lac de Tunis.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 29 May 2024 at 10:48:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:JoseFigueroaAlcorta(AR-MCR.FOWM CM0007).jpg edit

Voting period ends on 28 May 2024 at 22:13:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
You confuse megapixels with MB. This photo is 1,936 × 2,662 = 5.15 million pixels (pixels, not bytes), so well with in the size guideline. It is 1.82 MB, but that has nothing to do with the guidelines. --Cart (talk) 16:09, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Decollage d'un groupe de flamants roses.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 28 May 2024 at 14:58:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Lactarius resimus Груздь настоящий.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 28 May 2024 at 14:31:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Hochofen 5, Halle -- 2024 -- 4164 (kreativ 4).jpg edit

Voting period ends on 28 May 2024 at 07:15:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Close wing moisture sucking and peeing activity of Papilio krishna (Moore, 1858) - Krishna Peacock (2) WLB.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 28 May 2024 at 03:56:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Toco Toucan (Ramphastos toco) - 48153967707.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 28 May 2024 at 00:24:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Bond Lake winter.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 23:58:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Purple martin in flight (30977).jpg edit

Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 23:36:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Hirundinidae_(Swallows)
  •   Info Purple martin in flight, slowing down as it approaches its nest. Spent a long time try to get a sharp photo of these very fast birds -- I was happy with this one.
    Note: I tried something with the sky that I haven't attempted before, pulling a cloud from another shot taken at the same place at the same time from roughly the same direction. I don't know if that's too much retouching for FPC, but erring on the side of disclosure (it didn't affect the bird itself -- just improved the background a little). all by — Rhododendrites talk |  23:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Support — Rhododendrites talk |  23:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Support Good job TOUMOU (talk) 08:27, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Oppose I feel quite strongly that replacing sky is not acceptable for FP. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:07, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Support After spending a couple of hours (unsuccessfully) trying to get a decent shot of flying swallows, I understand your plights, great work! I have no issue with the replaced sky, since it is clearly mentioned. --Julesvernex2 (talk)
  •   Support as per Julesvernex2. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Comment It is mentioned but that doesn't make it acceptable. We can't go around replacing backgrounds. Where would that stop? Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:09, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Why can't we? Restricting FP to the rules of photojournalism and photo contests would leave out a bunch of interesting candidates. Julesvernex2 (talk) 21:40, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • You have never manipulated a background (or a foreground)? All of the out-of-focus twigs, distracting leaves, bird/bug-specks in the background, etc. that you've photographed -- you've never removed them? Pay no mind to extraordinary feats of AI-enabled sharpening, AI-based denoising, selective tone adjustments, and all other manner of post-processing, but add a cloud (a cloud in the sky at that place and at that time, even) and all of a sudden I've crossed a bright line? I'm not saying it shouldn't matter -- I know it'll go against some people's sensibilities, which is why I highlighted it in the nomination statement, and anyone is free to oppose if they wish -- but this Arbiter of What's Acceptable stuff is too much. — Rhododendrites talk |  21:51, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Technically, any panorama which includes sky and clouds will have several spots in the sky where parts are from other neighboring photos, so in fact replaced and often tweaked/reshaped by the processing program to look nice. I can guarantee that the sky never looked exactly like in this image, because it is a product of the program that stitched the panorama. We accept that without question because they are declared as panoramas and we know they are "manipulated". As long as the alteration is openly declared in a very clear manner (which has been made here), I see no problem with entering such photos here at FPC. It's just a matter of classification, and in each case votes can decide how much they are willing to tolerate in an FPC. Ideally it would be great if the original was found in the file's upload history so that we can see each step, I think that would help people decide how they are going to vote. In this case, I suspect there is no great difference. --Cart (talk) 22:17, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      • For good measure, I've uploaded the version before the sky adjustment and reverted. Note that the uploaded file is also before another pass at tone adjustments/white balancing so it looks slightly different in other [more mundane] ways. — Rhododendrites talk |  22:40, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
        It is indeed a small but surprisingly effective change! A small nitpick: those beautiful steel blue feathers above the eyes got quite a bit duller after the tonal adjustments. Julesvernex2 (talk) 12:18, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 22:33, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Oppose I agree with Charles that heavy-handed manipulations (like sky replacements) applied to images which will be used in a context where the audience can expect a realistic depiction of the subject shouldn't be featured here. As image manipulations seem to come up more often these days, there might be a need for a more in-depth discussion about what's ok and what's not. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:51, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • A discussion has been opened on the FPC talk page. --Cart (talk) 12:07, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • The "heavy-handed manipulation" didn't change the subject at all, so if the point is to ensure a photo of a martin looks like a martin that's irrelevant here. If it's to ensure a martin could be seen in front of a realistic background, the fact that it's the same sky from the same place/time would seem pretty realistic. So what's left is an arbitrary line whereby using AI to manipulate an image's noise/sharpness, stitching images, using content-aware fill, outright removing pieces like disturbing plants and smears, etc. is acceptable and this is not. I would feel less strongly about this if people just said "it offends my photographer's sensibilities in ways that a wide range of other manipulations and 'unrealities' do not" rather than act as though this is unrealistic but the rest of what we see at FPC is completely realistic. — Rhododendrites talk |  13:51, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:White ibis (10268).jpg edit

Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 23:04:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Moineaux - Sud tunisien.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 21:34:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
Hi TOUMOU, I see that Rhododendrites has helped you with the categories and fixing the description, thanks for that. Documentation of the photo is just as important for FPC as a good image, so take a look at the changes that have been made on the file page. Good information on the file page will always improve your chances of getting a photo promoted to FP, since info makes it more valuable to the Wiki project. Therefore, would you please add the location to the photo too. If you don't know it, please ask the photographer Skander zarrad. I have fixed the gallery link for you. You need to specify both the right page and the section. When you nominate an image here, you become sort of a "temporary caretaker" of that photo, and it's up to you to make sure everything is fixed and correct. Best, --Cart (talk) 10:57, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Done I added the location of the photo, it was taken as part of a photo walk organised during the WLE this year Thank you for your help and suggestion TOUMOU (talk) 11:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
thank you
i will do this for all my photos Skander zarrad (talk) 15:18, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That is good to hear. :-) You could start with your photo of the flamingos since it is now nominated here. And welcome to FPC! --Cart (talk) 16:28, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am sure he will be right. I was in that part of Tunisia in March with Mohamed-Ali Dhakhli, one of Tunisia's top bird guides and we observed quite a few hybrids; they didn't all look the same; but El Golli Mohamed will know his own birds. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:01, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sweets-Jamin-Store-2024.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 19:30:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Dar El Hadith - 20240512 153022.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 17:13:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Two black cabs with Big Ben in the background.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 14:01:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Close wing Basking of Spindasis vulcanus (Fabricius, 1775) - Common Silverline WLB.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 11:53:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:At Paraty 2023 080 - High tide at Rua da Praia.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 08:15:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Tanner at work, Medina of Marrakesh.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 26 May 2024 at 17:15:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
Nice photo! Are you sure he is a tanner or has there been a simple mix-up in the translation? A tanner is someone who process the raw hides into leather, a very hazardous and revolting job. After that the leather goes to a currier who dyes and prepare the leather before it can be made into different things by a leather worker. Traditionally, such craftsmen are called "saddlers" even if they make other things from leather than saddles. Perhaps he performs all three professions and we only see one of them (leather working) here in the photo. Love the cat! :-) --Cart (talk) 17:46, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Oppose Only until file name is changed as pointed out by Cart. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:49, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pécheur sur son bateau à Kerkennah.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 26 May 2024 at 07:43:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:The copper chaser.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 14:18:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
Comments about profession depicted
  •   Comment Hi IssamBarhoumi, what a great photo! However, what he is doing is a bit mislabeled. What he is doing is not engraving, but it is very common for people outside the handicraft trade to know the difference. ;-) Engraving is when you cut away material to make patterns (no hammer involved for engraving metals). What he is doing is called chasing, part of the repoussé and chasing techniques used by copper, silver and goldsmiths. Chasing is when you hammer in a pattern into the material, and repoussé is when you hammer out patterns from the backside of the material. I have fixed up the description and the categories for you, but would you mind if the file was renamed too so that is showed the right profession. I'm so happy that we finally have a really good photo for the wiki articles and chasers on Wikidata. Coppersmiths often use many different techniques to make the patterns on their work, and the right terminology for all of them is not easy. Best, --Cart (talk) 15:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Comment Hi -- Cart I will rename the file and inform you when done --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 15:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Great, all done now and I've fixed the code for your nomination to keep everything running as it should. --Cart (talk) 16:41, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Comment dear Cart thank you for all especially for giving me idea about the difference between the tow techniques -- IssamBarhoumi 19:45, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blesbok (Damaliscus pygargus phillipsi) head Malolotja.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 13:30:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Musée Louvre-Lens Fragment du palais de Darius, SB 23177 (1).jpg edit

Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 10:42:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • Es-tu certain que la balance des blancs est correcte ici ? L'image semble un peu jaune.
  • Are you certain that the white balance is right here? It seems a bit yellow. Yann (talk) 10:27, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed better. So   Support --Yann (talk) 09:07, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This fragment of the decoration of the palace of the Persian king Darius the Great, is an element taken from the frieze of archers found in the Achaemenid palace of Susa. The work of wall art is made up of glazed bricks with reliefs, of which unfortunately the shine of the enamels used has now decomposed under the effect of time and humidity, which explains why it cannot be very specific regarding the standards of the images presented, best regards.--Pierre André (talk) 16:22, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tribu Laarim, Kimotong, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-24, DD 130.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 16:59:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
I checked the case using Google and Wikipedia. The place is some 180 km from Juba, the capital town, it is definitely not a city like London or Tokyo, but it is a town of 490 000+ population, it has airport, banks, schools and university, telecommunication company, TV and shops of electronics, churches of several confessions, etc. There is a school and a clinic in Kimotong. So, I do not think that they are so innocent to not understand the consequences of photography. And I agree that the photo has documentary value and encyclopedic value. LexKurochkin (talk) 07:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Excuse me, but do you believe to know better than me where I was? it was not in the city of Kimotong, but a remote village in the province. And that's precisely why we went there. It was not a photo tour behind a mall in Juba. There is no shops, no current, no telecom, no transport or something like that in the area. The closest water well could be 1 hour away by foot. Telling this wiöl surely make no difference and people will believe whatever they want, but whatsoever. Poco a poco (talk) 07:24, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I did not pretend to know the place better than you, as I said clearly, I just used Google and Wkipedia. I tryed to understand. And, actually, you told us your vision of the place only in this particular post. LexKurochkin (talk) 08:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 
Look up “photodocumentary” in
Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
Have you ever heard about documentary photography? ★ 20:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can you ask the same to those people?--Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:22, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think, yes, considering my other comment. Actually, there are not too many places of that grade of innocence nowadays. May be somewhere deep in jungle, but not only 180 km from their capital. LexKurochkin (talk) 07:03, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
180 km without any transport means (or public transport options) and with no asphalt roads (a 4x4 is required) is not what you may think of (definitely not a 1 and a half hours smooth drive). In fact, wit a 4x4 we couldn't drive often faster than 30 km/h Poco a poco (talk) 07:26, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are of course different degrees of innocense, but i seriously doubt that she is aware of how people with a scarification fetish will use this photo. --Cart (talk) 14:03, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To oppose on the grounds that the person depicted is 'innocent' is patronising. Seems a high quality, respectful, documentary image to me. Part of a very valuable and impressive set of images from Poco. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:20, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I believe that you need to know Africa to judge images like this one. Best regards from Amboseli :) Poco a poco (talk) 15:21, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm African and this is very wrong. Wolverine XI 16:02, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please elaborate that? black Africa really?? Poco a poco (talk) 16:23, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's complicated. I'm part American, part European but mostly Sub-Saharan African. Wolverine XI 03:41, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And Real Madrid fan? you're good ;) At least we have that in common Poco a poco (talk) 03:58, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm still new to the game, having only started to support Real Madrid in October or November of 2021. Coming back to what matters, Poco a poco, having lived in Africa for more than 17 years, I am the best person to understand the mindset of black Africans. My biggest problem is that you're photographing a naked black woman, probably the most discriminated group in the world. White people will never understand black people, and that's okay. Looking at this picture makes me feel ashamed to be black. I should just stop talking now. Wolverine XI 11:18, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rufous-throated Partridge 0A2A9937.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 12:20:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
Very true! Unfortunately, this is an old problem on FPC. Too many voters who have never tried photographing under difficult conditions, or have no proper understanding of what can be done technically, will think that all photos should have the same quality as a well-lit, stacked church façade or a studio photo. --Cart (talk) 20:01, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Cart's statement comes across as passive-aggressive. If I understand correctly, you are directly placing me in the category of "voters who have never tried photographing under difficult conditions, or have no proper understanding of what can be done technically". That's fine, do you; there's a legitimate reason why I don't post my pictures here, but that doesn't make me any less inadequate. I have no problem with the other responses here, except Cart's. Keep in mind that this is not the first time it has occurred; see here. Wolverine XI 07:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There can be no argument on the settings used. But the criticism in the context of FPC is valid. It is difficult to take an FP-standard image in low light. I would be more than happy to support this level of technical quality if the bird was rare. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, this.   Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:01, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I strongly agree with you. This issue should be addressed. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:49, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Duomo and Tower of Pisa at sunrise.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 11:20:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
Well, you know how picky voters are about tilted photos. ;-) --Cart (talk) 19:01, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That was a good one, Cart :–). You made my day … – Aristeas (talk) 07:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
{{oppose}} I don't like the tilt. --~~~~ /s --SHB2000 (talk) 10:40, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Oppose The author can't help it, but I can't get used to the scaffolding in a prominent place.--Milseburg (talk) 13:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Are you sure it ruins the photo? ★ 15:56, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I wouldn't say ruin. But the scaffolding is too disturbing for an FP. The conditions for an outstanding image of this building were not present at that time. The rising sun is nice to have, but for a FP of this ensemble of buildings, I would forgo it and prefer if important parts of the building are not covered by elements that wouldn't normally belong. BTW, the crop is a bit tight, isn't it? --Milseburg (talk) 16:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Comment Just a comment (no critic of your vote!). I completely understand the dislike for the scaffolding. Personally I have learned to resign myself with it especially in photographs of very prominent buildings. I have visited Florence, Siena, and Pisa (to mention just the most famous Cathedral towns of Tuscany) each several times, but AFAICR never seen any of the famous cathedrals without scaffolding – when the restoration work was finished at one part, the next part was scaffolded to carry on with the work. The same applies to all major French cathedrals I know. Therefore I am rather happy with photos like this one because it offers at least an almost clean foreground (almost no cars, people, stands/kiosks – all these nasty things which often ruin photos of such buildings). – Aristeas (talk) 07:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC)   Comment Cologne Cathedral always has scaffolding somewhere. But if a prominent part, like one of the towers, was scaffolded, no FP would be possible at that time. Taking an FP is difficult, it is not possible under every condition. --Milseburg (talk) 16:58, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:48, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Atlas nautique du Monde edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 11:20:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

File:Sunset view of Everest.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 00:32:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  Oppose Outstanding scene. But the sharpness doesn't convince me and the elaboration seems too dark to me. IMHO there is also to much empty sky. Overall not perfect enough for a FP. --Milseburg (talk) 16:58, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Milseburg I wouldn't say the scene is too dark. Again, noticable details. However, assuming by the colors on the very top, it is somewhere between nautical and astronomical twilight due to the redness. I've browsed through some categories of mountains during sunset, and the ones that had significant light had a more yellow shade, while this one is more red. The sky could probably be cropped a bit, but the sky is an important feature of this image. WildMouse76 (talk) 22:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Frank Schulenburg, technically, it's the same effect that you have at the Horsetail Fall (Yosemite) (nearer where you live). With the sun at the right angle and normal conditions at sunset, the red light will prevail and strike the surfaces that can be reached by the light. The red light is not that uncommon, but it gets so striking when isolated to a few patches by the shadows of surrounding mountains. --Cart (talk) 11:33, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 22 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /WildMouse76 (talk) 05:15, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Nepal

File:Flamant rose Thyna009.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 21:18:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

Alternative edit

 

Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:28, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Phoenicopteridae (Flamingos)
The chosen alternative is: File:Flamant rose Thyna009 (cropped).jpg


Timetable (day 5 after nomination) edit 

Sat 18 May → Thu 23 May
Sun 19 May → Fri 24 May
Mon 20 May → Sat 25 May
Tue 21 May → Sun 26 May
Wed 22 May → Mon 27 May
Thu 23 May → Tue 28 May

Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting) edit 

Tue 14 May → Thu 23 May
Wed 15 May → Fri 24 May
Thu 16 May → Sat 25 May
Fri 17 May → Sun 26 May
Sat 18 May → Mon 27 May
Sun 19 May → Tue 28 May
Mon 20 May → Wed 29 May
Tue 21 May → Thu 30 May
Wed 22 May → Fri 31 May
Thu 23 May → Sat 01 Jun

Closing a featured picture promotion request edit

The bot edit

Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.

Manual procedure edit

Any experienced user may close requests.

  1. In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
    {{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}}
     (for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
  2. Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
    featured or not featured
    For example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
    becomes
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured ===
  3. Save your edit.
  4. If it is featured:
    • Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
    • Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
    • Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
      • If it was an alternative image, use the subpage/com-nom parameter: For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
      • If the image is already featured on another wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
    • Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
      • The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
      • You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
    • Add == FP promotion ==
      {{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the Talk Page of the nominator.
  5. As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
    {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
    Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/May 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.

Closing a delisting request edit

  1. In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
    '''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
    (for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg)
  2. Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
    delisted or not delisted
    For example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted ===
  3. Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/May 2024.
  4. If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
    1. Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
    2. Edit the picture's description as follows:
      1. Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes).
      2. Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
      3. Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (d:Property:P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
    3. Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery is not removed.
  5. If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.

Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination edit

  1. In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
    {{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}}
  2. Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
    not featured
    For example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
    becomes
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured ===
  3. Save your edit.
  4. Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
    {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
    Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/May 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates&oldid=871865169"